The more I read on Graves' site the more it becomes apparent to me that this is a race issue to him. He sees it as the government's way of getting rid of the blacks. The blacks are the only group he names specifically, choosing to refer to everyone else as "undesirables" (not as an insult). This is reflected in his explanation of the project's name, MK-NAOMI.

The “MK” portion stands for the two co-authors of the AIDS virus, Robert Manaker and Paul Kotin. The “NAOMI” portion stands for “Negroes are Only Momentary Individuals.”
http://www.boydgraves.com/timeline/ (look at the endish area)

You have to be shitting me. So the virus that spread throughout every culture and race was made specifically to kill the black community? How the fuck does that make any sense?! If anything it was "made" to fuck the gay community. Also, how does he explain the outbreaks of AIDS everywhere else in the world? This isn't an attempt to cure the virus on moral grounds, this is the result of a paranoid, black-centric worldview. I can understand where it comes from, but that doesn't make it anymore valid than white workers complaining about the Mexicans stealing their jobs.

BTW, I'm not really asking anyone these questions. Feel free to answer them if you want, but this was more of a rant than anything else. It just frustrates me to no end when I see people act like this. Some of it may be "justified" but that doesn't excuse the hate and meaningless paranoia it breeds.

EDIT: I just realized that he makes it sound like Foxdie. I loled.
http://metalgear.wikia.com/wiki/FoxDie

Sorry it took me so long to post my response to this one. I thought I already posted something, but I think I ran out of time and had to go to class and then forgot and restarted my computer before finishing the post.

For the first patent document: I can't speak to the efficacy of this specific chemical. However, I would guess that if it is as effective as the patent (and the rest of the internet) claims, I know exactly why it isn't commercially available. Money. The chemical is made with silver. Silver ain't cheap. Even if it were, I don't think there's enough silver on the planet to cure everyone infected with HIV.

For the second patent document: Firstly, look at the filing date. HIV was around before 1984. Secondly, if you read more than the title of the patent filing, you see it isn't about reproducing the virus to infect people. It's to study the virus outside of a human body. Don't take this as being condescending, but I don't expect you to understand the stuff in the patent. It's really complicated shit. I don't even understand most of it. In fact, I think a lot of times companies will purposefully make their patent filings overly complicated so that it's harder for them to get ripped off.

As for the documents detailing the US gov't involvement in virus production: yes, it's called biological warfare. I don't believe they created HIV. Honestly, we don't have the technology to create viruses from scratch. My class has done some work with viruses this semester, and it's really fuckin hard just to get normal viruses to grow, much less engineer them.
One of the problems with conspiracy theories like this is that the documents are so absurdly long that nobody in their right mind would read them, so you have to just take the word of whoever is telling you about them.

Also, this isn't directly related here, but it's a good point to make. One of my chemistry professors did a lot work in grad school trying to make anti-HIV drugs. She made one that looked incredibly promising, too. It made it completely impossible to HIV to infect new cells. The only problem was that it also killed every single cell it contacted. There are lots of antiviral agents whose mode of activity is to harm the target cells. A lot of people don't understand the way most cancer treatments work: they kill all your cells slowly. All of them. The theory is that cancer cells divide so rapidly that you kill them all before you kill yourself. Sometimes it doesn't work.

This is a total tangent, but kind of an interesting factoid. Before the discovery of antibiotics, one of the most common treatments for bacterial infections was snake venom. It worked (and failed) under basically the same principle.